I recently spent two weeks touring college campuses with my daughter. I quickly became fascinated with the process…everything from the information sessions to the student guided tours to the admissions requirements made me think about what hiring authorities at companies could learn from the college admissions process.
What struck me on these tours were six things that schools practice routinely that you would think would also be important to the corporate hiring process, but are rarely the norm. I know that the admissions processes for schools and the hiring processes for companies are different, but there is certainly crossover between the two and I think corporate America could learn a lot from the way schools manage the process of sourcing and recruiting the best talent. Here’s what I observed.
- 100% of applications are read. Some of the schools we visited receive more than 30,000 applications annually. And generally, at least two people in the admissions office review each application. Compare that to the number of resumes that are actually read for open positions at a company. Why is it that admissions counselors can read so many applications with one or more essays attached to each, yet recruiters can barely spend more than 10 seconds scanning a resume?
- There are clearly defined standards and guidelines for applicants. Colleges and universities are very clear on their academic standards. Admissions requirements for standardized test scores and GPA are laid out in plain English. Company job descriptions rarely if ever, outline the job requirements as efficiently. Most are packed with language that focuses on nebulous personal attributes such as self-starter, team player, or individual with strong written and verbal communications skills and few describe the tangible requirements of the job beyond years of experience or knowledge of a particular industry. And then hiring managers wonder why they get so many unqualified applicants. I doubt Yale gets too many applicants with a 2.0 GPA and a standardized test score in the bottom 25%.
- Visits to the facility are welcome. Colleges and universities invite prospective students to visit their campuses. Admissions counselors agree that it is important for students to get a feel for the culture and community of the school. They only want you to apply if you think you would fit in. We looked at dorm rooms, ate in the campus cafeteria, rode on the school run transportation, and looked at student projects in the library. We observed interactions on campus, read about school activities on the bulletin boards, and peeked inside of classrooms. How many companies invite you on to their premises to see what it is like to work there?
- Websites are engaging and interactive. Before touring any colleges, we checked out the online presence of each school we were considering visiting to gain a better understanding of what the school had to offer. All the websites were excellent and offered multi-media options for learning about the school. We viewed YouTube videos, FAQ pages, student interviews, and even went into a student chat room to gain a better understanding of what it would be like to attend that school. Every website had a strong social media presence and offered several electronic options for following what was happening on campus. The majority of the company career portals I view lack this level of engagement and to make matters worse, they often make applying for open positions so cumbersome, that it seems like only the most desperate job seekers would bother.
- Every applicant is informed of their status on a set date. Every school had a clearly defined time frame for informing students of their admissions decision. Expectations are clear and there are no surprises. Imagine knowing that you would actually receive a call from a hiring manager on the day they say they will call you. Unfortunately that rarely happens and more frequently the norm is that the process is delayed by several days, weeks, or even months.
- People in the organization support and even evangelize the brand. All the campus tours were went on were led by students….happy, excited, and spirited students. These kids weren’t faking it. They were incredible brand ambassadors and they were authentic. They discussed what they loved about their school and were candid when answering questions from prospective parents and students. I know of few corporate environments that offer such a credible take on what goes on inside their organizations.
I really think corporations can learn something from the way schools recruit and I definitely think there is room for improvement in corporate hiring practices. What do you think?
Having gone through the college admission process with my son last year, I agree with much of what you say. However, I do think that many of the behaviors that you admire are driven by the different goals of college admissions offices and businesses.
While the college admissions office would indeed like to put together the best class (a nebulous term for the ages), their success is ultimately judged by the number of applications they generate and, sadly, the number of applicants they reject. This creates an incentive to treat every applicant and prospective applicant nicely. Even those who are clearly unqualified –especially those who are clearly unqualified and can be rejected at a glance– help the school achieve its goal of seeming as selective as possible. In effect, applicants are treated as hot leads. Worse, they are being wooed by an institution that can only accommodate a finite number of those leads, already knows that it will convert more qualified leads than it can possibly accommodate, and tries to pump up the number of leads (aka stressed-out teenagers) anyway. The schools also suffer no real consequences on the back end because, unlike most business, their customer base is non-recurring: Almost all of the rejected applicants will be somewhere else the next year and will never be potential customers again.
While companies do have an incentive to treat each applicant well –after all, the folks who are applying today may well be the folks who they want to hire, or worse, who will be bad mouthing them, tomorrow– the ultimate goal in their search is finding the one right hire,rather than maximizing the number of applications. This often leads to inexcusable behavior, particularly in a seller’s market when the number of applicants is vast and the repercussions of rudeness just feel too abstract (even more abstract if a search firm is running the show). So sadly, civility is limited to those searches where the searchers happen to believe is civility. Would that there were more of them.
Thanks for the post.
Yitz,
These are excellent points…I particularly like the one about college applicants not being recurring customers. I am starting to learn the ins and outs of the college admission process and I am already seeing some of what you are commenting on. There is good and bad in every process. Perhaps in the future both employers and admissions offices can learn from each other. Thanks for commenting!